Scenario
A member finds three different answers: an agency guide, an investor overlay, and an AUS condition. They need to know which source controls the next move.
Lesson 1 · Decision-tree workshop
Teach members to turn a guideline, overlay, matrix note, AUS condition, or investor answer into a clean decision tree.
A member finds three different answers: an agency guide, an investor overlay, and an AUS condition. They need to know which source controls the next move.
The member can classify the source, scope, date, channel, decision, missing facts, and owner before asking for help.
Skool summary
Guidelines are not vibes. Learn the source-to-decision habit: source, date, channel, scope, missing facts, and owner.
Name the source before arguing the rule: agency guide, investor overlay, rate-sheet note, product matrix, AUS finding, condition text, internal policy, or AE/underwriter answer. A source without date and channel is only half useful.
Ask what the rule applies to: product, occupancy, transaction type, property type, documentation path, state, channel, investor, delivery, or timing. Many bad guideline fights happen because the member is using the right sentence in the wrong scope.
Force the answer into one label: eligible, ineligible, eligible with conditions, agency-eligible but not saleable here, missing facts, or unclear. If unclear, name the fact or source needed next.
Homework